POINT
Court direction was to 'consider' employee's representation, which was duly complied with, though the representation was considered on merits. The employee, instead of assailing the representation in a fresh Writ Petition, filing a contempt petition. - High Court directing that the employee be absorbed in a suitable post - Held, such an order was without jurisdiction and should not have been passed on a contempt petition which itself was not maintainable - High Court cannot give relief on merits especially if the contempt petition itself not maintainable.
PARTIES
Lalit Mathur vs. Maheshwara Rao
CITATION
(2000) 10 SCC 285
No comments:
Post a Comment